# Is Ghost the right choice? **URL:** \ **Category:** Using Ghost\ **Created:** [June 25, 2023, 4:08pm UTC](https://forum.ghost.org/t/is-ghost-the-right-choice/39447 "2023-06-25T16:08:21Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 14
**Author:** ![Stromfeldt](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/user_avatar/forum.ghost.org/stromfeldt/32/13572_2.png) [@Stromfeldt](https://forum.ghost.org/u/Stromfeldt)\ **Post date:** [June 26, 2023, 1:41am UTC](https://forum.ghost.org/t/is-ghost-the-right-choice/39447/14 "2023-06-26T01:41:19Z")
> [@coryfalter](#): > > Actually, I believe the personalization is just via the newsletter and not the actual website experience… but, I’m sure that’s coming for everyone soon, right? No sign of that coming anytime soon, but if you’d like to vote for such a thing you can do so on the Idea topic I set up for exactly that. > [@Automated recap newsletters based on reader-selected tags and/or authors](https://forum.ghost.org/t/automated-recap-newsletters-based-on-reader-selected-tags-and-or-authors/31685): > > The new multiple newsletters functionality is great, particularly for creators who want to add a personal touch to one or more newsletters for their readership. Meanwhile, on the opposite side of the spectrum might be completely automated newsletters, newsletters which aren’t personalised by the creator with included messages but are instead personalised by the site’s readers themselves. Let’s say you’ve got a fairly large publication that churns out a fair amount of content each week, split up… --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.ghost.org/t/is-ghost-the-right-choice/39447)._