Built a browser-based static site exporter for Ghost – anyone else going fully static?

Hey everyone,

I’ve been running Ghost for a while and really love the editor and membership features, but the dynamic nature started feeling heavy for simple blogs: slower loads, constant server costs and maintenance, more infrastructure to manage.

Ghost CMS has a great editor and clean content structure, which makes it a perfect fit for creating static sites for blogging or small business use.

I built a tool called SnapStatic: it takes a Ghost site (via URL + Content API key) and generates a clean static version — no install needed, no Node, no terminal, no Docker. Just your Ghost server URL and Content API key.

It generates fast static HTML from your Ghost frontend (90+ Lighthouse performance scores), supports Ghost 5–6, and works with Ghost’s default themes. Here’s a live demo of a generated static site.

Generation speed depends mainly on network round-trips to your Ghost server, fetching pages, images, and assets. SnapStatic processes routes sequentially so it won’t overwhelm your Ghost instance with concurrent requests. It also supports incremental builds, so after the first full generation only changed content gets rebuilt.

The whole process can be fully automated via Ghost webhooks and git. Set up a webhook in Ghost and SnapStatic, when you edit and publish content, it automatically pushes to your git service and lets you deploy to free hosts like Cloudflare Pages, GitHub Pages, or Netlify for basically $0 ongoing.

Curious if others here have gone (or are thinking of going) fully static with their Ghost content? What trade-offs did you hit (comments, newsletters, memberships), and how did you handle them?

Would love feedback — feel free to try it, no login required: https://snapstatic.io

Thanks!

1 Like